Chen, Daniel L. and Schonger, Martin (2022) Social preferences or sacred values ? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations. Science Advances, vol.8 (n°19).
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
Text
Download (761kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Recent advances in economic theory, largely motivated by experimental findings, have led to the adoption of models of human behavior where decision-makers take into consideration not only their own payoff but also others’ payoffs and any potential consequences of these payoffs. Investigations of deontological motivations, where decision-makers make their choice based on not only the consequences of a decision but also the decision per se, have been rare. We provide a formal interpretation of major moral philosophies and a revealed preference method to distinguish the presence of deontological motivations from a purely consequentialist decision-maker whose preferences satisfy first-order stochastic dominance.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Date: | 13 May 2022 |
Refereed: | Yes |
Place of Publication: | Washington |
Subjects: | B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE |
Divisions: | TSE-R (Toulouse) |
Site: | UT1 |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2022 08:22 |
Last Modified: | 04 Apr 2024 14:01 |
OAI Identifier: | oai:tse-fr.eu:127560 |
URI: | https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/46499 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Social preferences or sacred values? Theroy and evidence of deontological motivations. (deposited 15 Mar 2018 10:47)
- Social preferences or sacred values ? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations. (deposited 12 Dec 2022 08:22) [Currently Displayed]