Chen, Daniel L. and Schonger, Martin (2022) Social preferences or sacred values ? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations. Science Advances, vol.8 (n°19).
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
Recent advances in economic theory, largely motivated by experimental findings, have led to the adoption of models of human behavior where decision-makers take into consideration not only their own payoff but also others’ payoffs and any potential consequences of these payoffs. Investigations of deontological motivations, where decision-makers make their choice based on not only the consequences of a decision but also the decision per se, have been rare. We provide a formal interpretation of major moral philosophies and a revealed preference method to distinguish the presence of deontological motivations from a purely consequentialist decision-maker whose preferences satisfy first-order stochastic dominance.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Date: | 13 May 2022 |
Refereed: | Yes |
Place of Publication: | Washington |
Subjects: | B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE |
Divisions: | TSE-R (Toulouse) |
Site: | UT1 |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2022 08:22 |
Last Modified: | 18 Nov 2024 13:25 |
OAI Identifier: | oai:tse-fr.eu:127560 |
URI: | https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/46499 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations. (deposited 27 Oct 2016 07:55)
- Social preferences or sacred values ? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations. (deposited 12 Dec 2022 08:22) [Currently Displayed]