Blais, André, Laslier, Jean-François, Sauger, Nicolas and Van Der Straeten, Karine (2010) Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study. Social Choice and Welfare, 35 (n°3). pp. 435-472.
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
We report on laboratory experiments on voting. In a setting where subjects have single-peaked preferences, we find that the rational choice theory provides very good predictions of actual individual behavior in one-round and approval voting elections but fares poorly in explaining vote choice under two-round elections. We conclude that voters behave strategically as far as strategic computations are not too demanding, in which case they rely on simple heuristics (under two-round voting) or they just vote sincerely (under single transferable vote).
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Date: | March 2010 |
Refereed: | Yes |
Subjects: | B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE |
Divisions: | TSE-R (Toulouse) |
Site: | UT1 |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jan 2012 06:02 |
Last Modified: | 02 Apr 2021 15:36 |
OAI Identifier: | oai:tse-fr.eu:22415 |
URI: | https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/3455 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study. (deposited 18 Jan 2012 06:00)
- Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study. (deposited 18 Jan 2012 06:02) [Currently Displayed]