Reynaert, Mathias and Sallee, James M. (2021) Who benefits when firms game corrective policies? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 13 (n° 1). pp. 372-412.

This is the latest version of this item.

[thumbnail of wp_tse_739.pdf]
Preview
Text
Download (1MB) | Preview
Identification Number : 10.1257/pol.20190019

Abstract

Firms sometimes comply with externality-correcting policies by gaming the measure that determines policy. This harms buyers by eroding information, but it benefits them when cost savings are passed through into prices. We develop a model that highlights this tension and use it to analyze gaming of automobile carbon emission ratings in the EU. We document startling increases in gaming using novel data. We then analyze the effects of gaming in calibrated simulations. Over a wide range of parameters, we find that pass through substantially outweighs information distortions; on net, buyers benefit from gaming, even when they are fooled by it.

Item Type: Article
Language: English
Date: February 2021
Refereed: Yes
Place of Publication: Nashville
JEL Classification: H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy
Q5 - Environmental Economics
Subjects: B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE
Divisions: TSE-R (Toulouse)
Site: UT1
Date Deposited: 25 Mar 2020 09:00
Last Modified: 19 Apr 2024 07:44
OAI Identifier: oai:tse-fr.eu:124149
URI: https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/34244

Available Versions of this Item

View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year