Adler, Matthew, Anthoff, David, Bosetti, Valentina, Garner, Greg, Keller, Klaus and Treich, Nicolas (2017) Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon. Nature Climate Change, 7. pp. 443-449.
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
The social cost of carbon (SCC) is a key tool in climate policy. The SCC expresses in monetary terms the social impact of the emission of a ton of CO2 in a given year. The SCC is calculated using a ‘social welfare function’ (SWF): a method for assessing social welfare. The dominant SWF in climate policy is the discounted-utilitarian SWF. Individuals’ well-being numbers (utilities) are summed, and the values for later generations are reduced (‘discounted’). This SWF has been criticized for ignoring the distribution of well-being and including an arbitrary time preference. Here, we use a ‘prioritarian’ SWF, with no time discount, to calculate the SCC. This SWF gives extra weight (‘priority’) to worse-off individuals. Prioritarianism is a well-developed concept in ethics and welfare economics, but has been rarely used in climate scholarship. We find substantial differences between the discounted-utilitarian and non-discounted prioritarian SCCs.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Date: | 22 May 2017 |
Refereed: | Yes |
Place of Publication: | Londres |
Subjects: | B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE |
Divisions: | TSE-R (Toulouse) |
Site: | UT1 |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jun 2017 10:24 |
Last Modified: | 02 Apr 2021 15:55 |
OAI Identifier: | oai:tse-fr.eu:31774 |
URI: | https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/24148 |