Bramoullé, Yann and Saint-Paul, Gilles (2010) Research Cycles. Journal of Economic Theory, 145 (5). pp. 1890-1920.
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
This paper studies the dynamics of fundamental research. We develop a simple model where researchers allocate their effort between improving existing fields and inventing new ones. A key assumption is that scientists derive utility from recognition from other scientists. We show that the economy can be either in a regime where new fields are constantly invented, and then converges to a steady state, or in a cyclical regime where periods of innovation alternate with periods of exploitation. Our analysis provides a rigorous foundation to the Kuhnian theory of scientific evolution. We show that scientists' care for reputation has a strong impact on research dynamics and tends to favor innovation. Especially, innovation fads may emerge. We also study welfare and find that the academic reputational reward system can help align scientists' short-term incentives with society's long-term interests.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Date: | September 2010 |
Refereed: | Yes |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Research dynamics, Innovation cycles, Scientific fads |
JEL Classification: | O39 - Other C61 - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis |
Subjects: | B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE |
Divisions: | TSE-R (Toulouse) |
Site: | UT1 |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jul 2014 17:27 |
Last Modified: | 02 Apr 2021 15:47 |
OAI Identifier: | oai:tse-fr.eu:26050 |
URI: | https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/15350 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Research Cycles. (deposited 18 Jan 2012 05:52)
- Research Cycles. (deposited 09 Jul 2014 17:27) [Currently Displayed]