Adler, Matthew, Hammitt, James K. and Treich, Nicolas (2012) The Social Value of Mortality Risk Reduction: VSL vs. the Social Welfare Function Approach. TSE Working Paper, n. 12-292, Toulouse

There is a more recent version of this item available.

Preview

Text Download (724kB) | Preview

Abstract

We examine how different welfarist frameworks evaluate the social value of mortality riskreduction. These frameworks include classical, distributively unweighted cost-benefit analysis—i.e., the “value per statistical life” (VSL) approach—and three benchmark social welfare functions (SWF): a utilitarian SWF, an ex ante prioritarian SWF, and an ex post prioritarian
SWF. We examine the conditions on individual utility and on the SWF under which these frameworks display the following five properties: i) wealth sensitivity, ii) sensitivity to baseline risk, iii) equal value of risk reduction, iv) preference for risk equity, and v) catastrophe aversion. We show that the particular manner in which VSL ranks risk-reduction measures is not
necessarily shared by other welfarist frameworks, and we identify when the use of an ex ante or an ex post approach has different implications for risk policymaking.

Available Versions of this Item

• The Social Value of Mortality Risk Reduction: VSL vs. the Social Welfare Function Approach. (deposited 09 Jul 2014 17:24) [Currently Displayed]
  • The social value of mortality risk reduction: The VSL versus the social welfare function approach. (deposited 16 Mar 2015 14:45)