Chen, Daniel L. and Philippe, Arnaud (2023) Clash of norms judicial leniency on defendant birthdays. IAST Working Paper, n. 18-76, Toulouse

There is a more recent version of this item available.

Preview

Text Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

We document judicial leniency on defendant birthdays across 5 million decisions. French sentences are 1% fewer and 3% shorter. U.S. federal sentences are 33% shorter in the day component of sentences (the month component remains unaffected). New Orleans sentences are 15% shorter overall. No leniency appears on the days before or after a defendant’s birthday. Federal judges using deterrence language in opinions, are unaffected, isolating the judicial as opposed to defendant channel. The effect is doubled when judge and defendant share the same race. Our courtroom setting rules out many models of social preferences with reciprocity motives.

Available Versions of this Item

• Clash of norms judicial leniency on defendant birthdays. (deposited 10 Jul 2018 15:01) [Currently Displayed]
  • Clash of norms judicial leniency on defendant birthdays. (deposited 20 Jul 2023 15:19)