Auriol, Emmanuelle, Hjelmeng, Erling and Søreide, Tina (2017) Deterring corruption and cartels : in search of a coherent approach. Concurrences Review (n° 1).

This is the latest version of this item.

[thumbnail of wp_tse_728.pdf]
Preview
Text
Download (185kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article addresses how the rules intended to protect consumers and taxpayers from economic crime, namely leniency and cartel settlements in competition law, criminal sanctions and debarment of suppliers from participation in public tenders for bribery, work together. While the economic reasoning behind these rules makes sense when considering each one of them in isolation, their impact is weaken when they are opposing each other. Competition authorities are narrowly mandated to control competition, and they do not seek out corruption. For criminal law investigators problems are created if they interfere (because it would undermine the leniency program); conversely, there are problems if they stay away (because that would undermine enforcement of corruption and other economic crimes). We propose to strengthen the regulation of corporate misconduct through better collaboration and integration of the other law enforcement functions and institutions that exist. The first step is to maintain and share a centralized database on firms’ offenses and settlements with anti-trust and procurement authorities. The second step is to expand the mandate and competence of competition authorities to search for, and react against, corruption.

Item Type: Article
Language: English
Date: 2017
Refereed: Yes
Subjects: B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE
Divisions: TSE-R (Toulouse)
Site: UT1
Date Deposited: 09 Nov 2016 14:23
Last Modified: 29 Jun 2021 08:27
OAI Identifier: oai:tse-fr.eu:31153
URI: https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/22493

Available Versions of this Item

View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year