eprintid: 50639
rev_number: 9
eprint_status: archive
userid: 2318
dir: disk0/00/05/06/39
datestamp: 2025-03-14 08:24:32
lastmod: 2025-03-14 08:24:32
status_changed: 2025-03-14 08:24:32
type: jurisnote
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Barrigue de Montvalon, Luc de
creators_id: luc.de_montvalon@univ-jfc.fr
creators_idrefppn: 233549021
creators_halaffid: 480290
title: Rester joignable pendant un déplacement professionnel ne suffit pas à établir l’existence d’un temps de travail effectif
ispublished: pub
subjects: subjects_DROIT43
abstract: Note sous Cass. soc., 13 mars 2024, n° 22-11.708, FS-B
date: 2024-05-07
date_type: published
publisher: Wolters Kluwer France
faculty: droit
divisions: IDP
language: fr
has_fulltext: FALSE
view_date_year: 2024
full_text_status: none
publication: Jurisprudence sociale Lamy
number: n° 584
place_of_pub: Bois-Colombes
pagerange: 8
refereed: TRUE
issn: 1279-8282
harvester_local_overwrite: eprintid
harvester_local_overwrite: userid
harvester_local_overwrite: faculty
harvester_local_overwrite: dir
harvester_local_overwrite: site
harvester_local_overwrite: type
harvester_local_overwrite: number
harvester_local_overwrite: date
harvester_local_overwrite: ispublished
harvester_local_overwrite: pagerange
harvester_local_overwrite: date_type
harvester_local_overwrite: publish_to_hal
harvester_local_overwrite: creators_name
harvester_local_overwrite: language
harvester_local_overwrite: refereed
harvester_local_overwrite: divisions
harvester_local_overwrite: creators_idrefppn
harvester_local_overwrite: publication
harvester_local_overwrite: title
harvester_local_overwrite: abstract
harvester_local_overwrite: creators_id
harvester_local_overwrite: subjects
harvester_local_overwrite: pending
harvester_local_overwrite: note
harvester_local_overwrite: issn
harvester_local_overwrite: creators_halaffid
harvester_local_overwrite: publisher
harvester_local_overwrite: place_of_pub
site: ut1
publish_to_hal: FALSE
citation:   Barrigue de Montvalon, Luc de <https://www.idref.fr/233549021>  (2024) Rester joignable pendant un déplacement professionnel ne suffit pas à établir l’existence d’un temps de travail effectif.    Jurisprudence sociale Lamy (n° 584).  p. 8.   [Caselaw headnote]