TY - RPRT CY - Toulouse ID - publications48022 UR - http://tse-fr.eu/pub/128163 A1 - von Schenk, Alicia A1 - Klockmann, Victor A1 - Bonnefon, Jean-François A1 - Rahwan, Iyad A1 - Köbis, Nils Y1 - 2023/06// N2 - People are not very good at detecting lies, which may explain why they refrain from accusing others of lying, given the social costs attached to false accusations — both for the accuser and the accused. Here we consider how this social balance might be disrupted by the availability of lie-detection algorithms powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Will people elect to use lie-detection AI that outperforms humans, and if so, will they show less restraint in their accusations? To find out, we built a machine learning classifier whose accuracy (66.86%) was significantly better than human accuracy (46.47%) lie-detection task. We conducted an incentivized lie-detection experiment (N = 2040) in which we measured participants’ propensity to use the algorithm, as well as the impact of that use on accusation rates and accuracy. Our results reveal that (a) requesting predictions from the lie-detection AI and especially (b) receiving AI predictions that accuse others of lying increase accusation rates. Due to the low uptake of the algorithm (31.76% requests), we do not see an improvement in accuracy when the AI prediction becomes available for purchase. PB - TSE Working Paper T3 - TSE Working Paper M1 - working_paper TI - Lie-detection algorithms attract few users but vastly increase accusation rates AV - public EP - 39 ER -