Electoral Cycles Among U.S. Courts of Appeals Judges

Berdejo, Carlos and Chen, Daniel L. (2017) Electoral Cycles Among U.S. Courts of Appeals Judges. Journal of Law and Economics, 60 (3). pp. 479-496.

This is the latest version of this item.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://tse-fr.eu/pub/32424

Abstract

We find field evidence for what experimental studies have documented regarding the contexts and characteristics that make individuals more susceptible to priming. Just before U.S. Presidential elections, judges on the U.S. Courts of Appeals double the rate at which they dissent and vote along partisan lines. Increases are accentuated for judges with less experience and in ideologically polarized environments. During periods of national reconciliation—wartime, for example—judges suppress dissents, again, especially by judges with less experience and in ideologically polarized environments. We show the dissent rate increases gradually from 6% to nearly 12% in the quarter before an election and returns immediately to 6% after the election. That highly experienced professionals making common law precedent can be politically primed raises questions about the perceived impartiality of the judiciary. We cannot rule out the possibility that judges—who profess to be unbiased—are intentionally biased, which also raises the question of intentional bias of professionals who claim to be unbiased.

Item Type: Article
Language: English
Date: August 2017
Refereed: Yes
Subjects: B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE
Divisions: TSE-R (Toulouse)
Site: UT1
Date Deposited: 22 May 2018 08:50
Last Modified: 24 Jan 2019 00:16
OAI ID: oai:tse-fr.eu:32424
URI: http://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/25827

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item