Chen, Daniel L. and Horton, John J. (2016) Are Online Labor Markets Spot Markets for Tasks?: A Field Experiment on the Behavioral Response to Wage Cuts. TSE Working Paper, n. 16-675, Toulouse

[thumbnail of Are_Online_Labor_Markets_Spot_Markets_for_Tasks_InfoSystemsR.pdf]
Preview
Text
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

In some online labor markets, workers are paid by the task, choose what tasks to work on, and have little or no interaction with their (usually anonymous) buyer/employer. These markets look like true spot markets for tasks rather than markets for employment. Despite appearances, we find via a field experiment that workers act more like parties to an employment contract: workers quickly form wage reference points and react negatively to proposed wage cuts by quitting. However, they can be mollified with “reasonable” justifications for why wages are being cut, highlighting the importance of fairness considerations in their decision making. We find some evidence that “unreasonable” justifications for wage cuts reduce subsequent work quality. We also find that not explicitly presenting the worker with a decision about continuing to work eliminates “quits,” with no apparent reduction in work quality. One interpretation for this finding is that workers have a strong expectation that they are party to a quasi-employment relationship where terms are not changed, and the default behavior is to continue working.

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Language: English
Date: July 2016
Place of Publication: Toulouse
Uncontrolled Keywords: Economics of IS, Electronic Commerce, Field Experiments, IT and new organizational form
Subjects: B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE
Divisions: TSE-R (Toulouse)
Institution: Université Toulouse 1 Capitole
Site: UT1
Date Deposited: 19 Jul 2016 13:02
Last Modified: 27 Oct 2021 13:36
OAI Identifier: oai:tse-fr.eu:30557
URI: https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/22223
View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year