Cremer, Helmuth and Roeder, Kerstin (2015) Means testing versus basic income: the (lack of) political support for a universal allowance. TSE Working Paper, n. 15-588

Warning
There is a more recent version of this item available.
[thumbnail of Cremer_18409.pdf]
Preview
Text
Download (370kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper studies the political economy of a basic income (BI) versus a means tested welfare scheme. We show in a very simple setting that if society votes on the type of system, its generosity as well as the “severity” of means testing (if any), a BI system could only emerge in the political equilibrium under very strong and empirically implausible conditions. Instead, the political process leads to a means tested system. The necessity to draw political support does affect the design of the system, but it only implies that means testing becomes less severe so that benefits are extended also to themiddle classes. However, a fully universal system is rejected by a majority.

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Language: English
Date: July 2015
Uncontrolled Keywords: Basic income, Means testing, Political support
JEL Classification: D3 - Distribution
D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
Subjects: B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE
Divisions: TSE-R (Toulouse)
Institution: Université Toulouse Capitole
Site: UT1
Date Deposited: 21 Sep 2015 13:08
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2021 15:49
OAI Identifier: oai:tse-fr.eu:29485
URI: https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/18409

Available Versions of this Item

View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year